- Arts & Culture 5952
- Business & Economics 689
- Computers 317
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 81
- Education & Science 76477
- Abstracts 252
- Astrology 4
- Astronomy 1
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 2513
- Coursework 15782
- Culture 9
- Diplomas 411
- Drawings 571
- Ecology 6
- Economy 82
- English 78
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17626
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 89
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 13871
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 23
- Physics 14894
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 101
- Psychology 60
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sexology 42
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 151
- Tests 9245
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 24
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 37
- Vetting 364
- Works 13
- Информатика 10
- Engineering 3060
- Fiction 696
- House, Family & Entertainment 107
- Law 132
- Website Promotion 71
Zhilkov worked at a municipal enterprise
Uploaded: 15.10.2019
Content: S19-179.docx 14,38 kB
Product description
Zhilkov worked in the municipal enterprise as the chief agronomist and was given a two-room office apartment, in which he moved in with his wife and minor son. In 2006, the marriage between the spouses Zhilkov was terminated, after which Zhilkov quit his job and left the office building for another permanent place of residence. The municipal enterprise requested the eviction of Zhilkova and her son from the official residential premises without providing other residential premises. Zhilkova objected to her eviction for the following reasons: 1) she and her husband lived in this apartment for 11 years, therefore, she cannot be evicted without providing another living quarters; 2) the marriage between her and Zhilkov is dissolved, their son is a minor, so they are a single mother and also can not be evicted from the premises without providing her with other housing. The plaintiff insisted on the satisfaction of the claims in connection with the fact that the office apartment was provided specifically to Zhilkova’s husband in connection with his labor relationship, Zhilkova herself works as a teacher at school, she was not a member of the labor relations with the organization that provided the premises, hence independent use not acquired. Thus, the residence time in this apartment does not matter. As for the Zhilkov’s son, for the whole last year he actually lived in the city with his grandmother, mother Zhilkova, he was 14 years old, and he is going to study at the College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, therefore he will also continue to live in the city, apart from the mother.
Resolve the dispute.
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0Period | |||
1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 |