- Arts & Culture 5937
- Business & Economics 689
- Computers 310
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 81
- Education & Science 74679
- Abstracts 251
- Astrology 4
- Astronomy 1
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 2221
- Coursework 15546
- Culture 9
- Diplomas 411
- Drawings 574
- Ecology 5
- Economy 83
- English 75
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17226
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 2
- Geology 1
- History 89
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 13855
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 23
- Physics 14834
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 101
- Psychology 60
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sexology 42
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 150
- Tests 8455
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 24
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 37
- Vetting 363
- Works 13
- Информатика 10
- Engineering 3058
- Fiction 696
- House, Family & Entertainment 107
- Law 132
- Website Promotion 71
April 5, 2006 between CITY OJSC
Uploaded: 13.04.2020
Content: S19-822.docx 17,23 kB
Product description
On April 5, 2006, CITI, represented by the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Gavrilova, entered into an employment contract for a period of three years, in accordance with which Gavrilova was appointed to the post of President of CITI. Clause 3 of Article 7 of the said agreement establishes that in case of termination before its expiration by decision of the Board of Directors, the president shall be paid compensation for early termination of the agreement in the amount equivalent to $ 100,000 no later than one month from the date of such decision. On May 27, 2007, the plaintiff was dismissed from her position under paragraph 2 of Article 278 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the adoption by the Board of Directors of CITI OJSC of a decision on the early termination of the employment contract. Compensation to the employee was not paid, in connection with which Gavrilova was forced to go to court.
Refusing to satisfy the requirements, the court proceeded from the fact that paragraph 3 of article 7 of the contract contradicts article 279 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, since the contract does not stipulate the payment of compensation in the presence or absence of guilty actions of the employee, as required by the specified legal norm.
Do you agree with the court decision?
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0| Period | |||
| 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |