- Arts & Culture 5941
- Business & Economics 689
- Computers 319
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 81
- Education & Science 76021
- Abstracts 252
- Astrology 4
- Astronomy 1
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 2330
- Coursework 15546
- Culture 9
- Diplomas 411
- Drawings 574
- Ecology 6
- Economy 83
- English 75
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17615
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 89
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 13871
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 23
- Physics 14870
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 101
- Psychology 60
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sexology 42
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 150
- Tests 9243
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 24
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 37
- Vetting 364
- Works 13
- Информатика 10
- Engineering 3062
- Fiction 696
- House, Family & Entertainment 107
- Law 132
- Website Promotion 71
Levin went to court with a lawsuit against Kotova
Uploaded: 15.10.2019
Content: S19-178.docx 17,07 kB
Product description
Levin filed a lawsuit against Kotova for recognition of the right to living space and the eviction of the latter. He explained that the apartment in St. Petersburg was provided in 1999 under a social contract of employment to a family of four - his parents, him and his brother.
After the death of his mother, by the decision of the District Court of St. Petersburg on October 6, 2002, Levin was declared missing. On November 10, 2002, the respondent registered a marriage with his brother and on November 12, 2002 was registered in the disputed apartment without his consent. Then his brother and father died. By a decision of the District Court of St. Petersburg dated November 5, 2005, the decision to declare Levin missing was annulled. He believes that he has the right to a controversial apartment, and the defendant, who was brought into the apartment without his consent and did not live with him as a single family, did not acquire the right to living space, therefore, she must be evicted.
Kotova objected to the satisfaction of the claim and filed a counterclaim recognizing her right to use the disputed apartment, referring to the fact that she lived in this residential area. She led a common household with her husband and his parents. She became a member of the employer´s family, and therefore acquired the right to live in an apartment.
Analyze the arguments of the parties and decide the case.
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0Period | |||
1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 |